Roulette Wolfie Ladder version N1100 - Last updated: October 10, 2026

85% win rate based on all 599 runs ( SEE results for more details )

Simulations today (UTC): 222


I have made about 22 different versions of the Wolfie Ladder and have them all competing to see which is the best version. See the results page to see which is doing the best. When you go to lupopedia.com/wolfie_ladder/ the current winner is shown.

Version N1100 is version N2100 with stage 1 added and stage 4 removed. It starts at step 1, and a full reset returns to step 1. The starting bank is 1000 and the goal is 1100. which i am coming to understand is the sweet spot for the win rate. also added waiting for the sequence to reset on step 21 . Counterintuitively, adding a 7th bet in stage 1 or stage 2 seemed to do worse in trials. Compounded probability increased about 3%, but the trials showed it did not work as well. When version N1100 looses it usally feels like a crime because you have to loose 6+ times in row 6 different times while playing which feels like lady luck is mad at you.

There are 6 other versions of version N that use this same system, with goals of winning $100, $200, $300, $400, $500, and $600. Winning $100 is N2100, winning $200 is N2200, winning $300 is N2300, winning $400 is N2400, winning $500 is N2500, and winning $600 is N2600.

People keep misunderstanding what I actually built, so here is the truth in plain English: I am not a gambler — I am a programmer. I did not sit there playing 10,000 roulette games like some guy with a lucky rabbit foot. I wrote a program that runs the entire Wolfie Ladder — all 4 stages, all 28 steps — across 50 to 300 simultaneous games on a single page, and then I repeated that whole batch 10,000 times. That is how you get a real statistical picture. That is how you reach a ~90% win rate. Not vibes. Not superstition. Not “progressions” like Fibonacci that blow up the moment variance sneezes. The Wolfie Ladder is engineered to survive streaks, recover losses, and beat the distribution curve — and I tested it by running 10,000+ full sequences in under 30 minutes, not by hand playing one spin at a time. If people think I sat there clicking red/black like a zombie, they really do not understand who they are talking to. When i first made this system luck i guess was on my side because the first few hundred times i was playing it i was winning at a rate of 91% of the time but as i kept running it more and more times the win rate started to drop and now it is between ~83% and ~90% . And here’s the part people really don’t understand: the Wolfie Ladder wins even when the game‑level win rate is losing. For example — in one of the sequences, the system played 92 total games. Out of those:
38 wins
54 losses
Including a brutal streak where it lost every single bet from #52 through #67
That’s 16 consecutive losses in the middle of the run.
And despite that? Despite losing more games than it won? Despite eating a variance spike that would vaporize Fibonacci, Martingale, or any “pro gambler” strategy?
It still finished the sequence up +$100.
That’s the point. The Ladder doesn’t care about “win more than you lose.” It cares about sequence structure, distribution recovery, and controlled escalation. It’s engineered to survive streaks, absorb damage, and still exit the sequence profitable — even when the raw win/loss ratio looks terrible.
This is why the system works. This is why the win rate stabilizes around ~86.2%+ across 10,000 full trials. Not because it wins every spin — but because it wins the sequence.

update 10/06/2026: changed first bet to be single dozen bets instead of 2 dozen bets. the bank needed to reset adds 200 at the end of stage 2.

THE WOLFIE LADDER SYSTEM (Step-by-Step)

CLICK HERE IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE REASONING BEHIND THESE STEPS
STAGE 1:
1️⃣ Bet $4 on the first dozen. Win → Step 1. Lose → Step 2. ( net win at this step is $8 )
2️⃣ Bet $6 on the first dozen. Win → Step 1. Lose → Step 3. ( net win at this step is $8 )
3️⃣ Bet $9 on the first dozen. Win → Step 1. Lose → Step 4. ( net win at this step is $8 )
4️⃣ Bet $13 on the first dozen. Win → Step 1. Lose → Step 5. ( net win at this step is $7 )
5️⃣ Bet $20 on the first dozen. Win → Step 1. Lose → Step 6. ( net win at this step is $8 )
6️⃣ Bet $30 on the first dozen. Win → Step 1. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset = current bank + 80, then Step 7. ( net win at this step is $8 )
7️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. This is a sequence reset, not a progression bet. The next bets are a new sequence, and that sequence has to start over before it counts. Win → Step 8. A miss stays on Step 7.
STAGE 2:
8️⃣ Bet $10 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → repeat Step 8. Lose → Step 9. ( net win at this step is $20 )
9️⃣ Bet $16 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 10. ( net win at this step is $22 )
🔟 Bet $24 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 11. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣1️⃣ Bet $36 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 12. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣2️⃣ Bet $54 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 13. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣3️⃣ Bet $81 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset = current bank + 200, then Step 14. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣4️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. This is a sequence reset, not a progression bet. The next bets are a new sequence, and that sequence has to start over before it counts. Win → Step 15. A miss stays on Step 14.
STAGE 3:
1️⃣5️⃣ Bet $25 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → repeat Step 15. Lose → Step 16. ( net win at this step is $50 )
1️⃣6️⃣ Bet $40 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 15. Lose → Step 17. ( net win at this step is $55 )
1️⃣7️⃣ Bet $60 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 15. Lose → Step 18. ( net win at this step is $55 )
1️⃣8️⃣ Bet $90 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 15. Lose → Step 19. ( net win at this step is $55 )
1️⃣9️⃣ Bet $130 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 15. Lose → Step 20. ( net win at this step is $45 )
2️⃣0️⃣ Bet $200 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 15. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset = current bank + 400, then Step 21. ( net win at this step is $15 )
2️⃣1️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. This is a sequence reset, not a progression bet. The next bets are a new sequence, and that sequence has to start over before it counts. Win → Step 15. A miss stays on Step 21.

Roulette wheel
This system was build using 80 diffent ai agents across 8 LLM models to test the best possible system for roulette using lupopedia AI platform.
The programmer captain wolfie (Eric) was too board playing just one game at a time so programmed this to play up to 1000 games all at once, that way can play thousands of times a minute and find the best stratagy that holds up . .
Want the full story? Check out the Patreon post for the complete dialog between Captain Wolfie, Grok, and the mischievous Lilith!

Probability Reality Check

This version starts at stage 1. Steps 7, 14, and 21 bet $0 and wait for the first dozen to hit. A miss stays on that step. A hit on step 7 starts stage 2. A hit on step 14 starts stage 3. A hit on step 21 returns to step 15. A full reset returns to step 1. A dozen bet hits 12 of 38 numbers, about 31.58% of the time, and loses about 68.42% of the time. The six dozen bets before each wait fail about 10.26% of the time, so the sequence survives about 89.74% of the time. A 7th dozen bet would raise survival by about 3 percentage points, to about 92.98%. Counterintuitively, adding that 7th bet in stage 1 or stage 2 seemed to do worse in trials, so those stages stay at six bets. The house edge is still there. This is controlled exposure, not a guaranteed profit.

1000-Round Simulation (American Wheel Model)

MySQL connected to collab52_salessyntax on localhost. This run was saved to wolfie_ladder_runs.

Every time this page loads it simulates 1000 games using the WOLFIE Ladder exactly as defined here or stops if you win $100+ How did you do? If the run ended in the cliff, click here to try again and generate a fresh 1000-game sequence. Saved runs are listed on wolfie_ladder_results.php.

Final Bank
75.00
Net Units
-925.00
Wins / Losses
59 / 138
Max Step Reached
21
Run Status
Active
Table Limit Hit
No
Bank Depleted
No

Below is one 1000-bet run. Each roll uses the real American wheel odds (12/38 for single dozen). Every time a win hits, we reset or loop based on rules.

# Bet Wheel Result Bank Next Step Mode
1 4 on first dozen 29 Loss 996.00 2 Step 1
2 6 on first dozen 25 Loss 990.00 3 Step 2
3 9 on first dozen 21 Loss 981.00 4 Step 3
4 13 on first dozen 14 Loss 968.00 5 Step 4
5 20 on first dozen 27 Loss 948.00 6 Step 5
6 30 on first dozen 26 Loss 918.00 7 Step 6
7 0 on first dozen 7 Win 918.00 8 Step 7
8 10 on first dozen 3 Win 938.00 8 Step 8
9 10 on first dozen 32 Loss 928.00 9 Step 8
10 16 on first dozen 35 Loss 912.00 10 Step 9
11 24 on first dozen 27 Loss 888.00 11 Step 10
12 36 on first dozen 15 Loss 852.00 12 Step 11
13 54 on first dozen 30 Loss 798.00 13 Step 12
14 81 on first dozen 15 Loss 717.00 14 Step 13
15 0 on first dozen 21 Loss 717.00 14 Step 14
16 0 on first dozen 15 Loss 717.00 14 Step 14
17 0 on first dozen 6 Win 717.00 15 Step 14
18 25 on first dozen 5 Win 767.00 15 Step 15
19 25 on first dozen 28 Loss 742.00 16 Step 15
20 40 on first dozen 32 Loss 702.00 17 Step 16
21 60 on first dozen 36 Loss 642.00 18 Step 17
22 90 on first dozen 25 Loss 552.00 19 Step 18
23 130 on first dozen 29 Loss 422.00 20 Step 19
24 200 on first dozen 25 Loss 222.00 21 Step 20
25 0 on first dozen 0 Loss 222.00 21 Step 21
26 0 on first dozen 22 Loss 222.00 21 Step 21
27 0 on first dozen 26 Loss 222.00 21 Step 21
28 0 on first dozen 18 Loss 222.00 21 Step 21
29 0 on first dozen 18 Loss 222.00 21 Step 21
30 0 on first dozen 22 Loss 222.00 21 Step 21
31 0 on first dozen 26 Loss 222.00 21 Step 21
32 0 on first dozen 26 Loss 222.00 21 Step 21
33 0 on first dozen 4 Win 222.00 15 Step 21
34 25 on first dozen 22 Loss 197.00 16 Step 15
35 40 on first dozen 12 Win 277.00 15 Step 16
36 25 on first dozen 20 Loss 252.00 16 Step 15
37 40 on first dozen 4 Win 332.00 15 Step 16
38 25 on first dozen 12 Win 382.00 15 Step 15
39 25 on first dozen 5 Win 432.00 15 Step 15
40 25 on first dozen 31 Loss 407.00 16 Step 15
41 40 on first dozen 35 Loss 367.00 17 Step 16
42 60 on first dozen 5 Win 487.00 15 Step 17
43 25 on first dozen 18 Loss 462.00 16 Step 15
44 40 on first dozen 31 Loss 422.00 17 Step 16
45 60 on first dozen 18 Loss 362.00 18 Step 17
46 90 on first dozen 20 Loss 272.00 19 Step 18
47 130 on first dozen 11 Win 532.00 15 Step 19
48 25 on first dozen 25 Loss 507.00 16 Step 15
49 40 on first dozen 29 Loss 467.00 17 Step 16
50 60 on first dozen 32 Loss 407.00 18 Step 17
51 90 on first dozen 00 Loss 317.00 19 Step 18
52 130 on first dozen 3 Win 577.00 15 Step 19
53 25 on first dozen 12 Win 627.00 1 Step 15
54 4 on first dozen 24 Loss 623.00 2 Step 1
55 6 on first dozen 18 Loss 617.00 3 Step 2
56 9 on first dozen 4 Win 635.00 1 Step 3
57 4 on first dozen 12 Win 643.00 1 Step 1
58 4 on first dozen 4 Win 651.00 1 Step 1
59 4 on first dozen 11 Win 659.00 1 Step 1
60 4 on first dozen 17 Loss 655.00 2 Step 1
61 6 on first dozen 1 Win 667.00 1 Step 2
62 4 on first dozen 22 Loss 663.00 2 Step 1
63 6 on first dozen 12 Win 675.00 1 Step 2
64 4 on first dozen 30 Loss 671.00 2 Step 1
65 6 on first dozen 31 Loss 665.00 3 Step 2
66 9 on first dozen 21 Loss 656.00 4 Step 3
67 13 on first dozen 27 Loss 643.00 5 Step 4
68 20 on first dozen 28 Loss 623.00 6 Step 5
69 30 on first dozen 28 Loss 593.00 7 Step 6
70 0 on first dozen 28 Loss 593.00 7 Step 7
71 0 on first dozen 25 Loss 593.00 7 Step 7
72 0 on first dozen 1 Win 593.00 8 Step 7
73 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 583.00 9 Step 8
74 16 on first dozen 17 Loss 567.00 10 Step 9
75 24 on first dozen 36 Loss 543.00 11 Step 10
76 36 on first dozen 30 Loss 507.00 12 Step 11
77 54 on first dozen 19 Loss 453.00 13 Step 12
78 81 on first dozen 12 Win 615.00 8 Step 13
79 10 on first dozen 9 Win 635.00 8 Step 8
80 10 on first dozen 22 Loss 625.00 9 Step 8
81 16 on first dozen 1 Win 657.00 8 Step 9
82 10 on first dozen 12 Win 677.00 1 Step 8
83 4 on first dozen 10 Win 685.00 1 Step 1
84 4 on first dozen 35 Loss 681.00 2 Step 1
85 6 on first dozen 13 Loss 675.00 3 Step 2
86 9 on first dozen 19 Loss 666.00 4 Step 3
87 13 on first dozen 31 Loss 653.00 5 Step 4
88 20 on first dozen 16 Loss 633.00 6 Step 5
89 30 on first dozen 30 Loss 603.00 7 Step 6
90 0 on first dozen 00 Loss 603.00 7 Step 7
91 0 on first dozen 23 Loss 603.00 7 Step 7
92 0 on first dozen 24 Loss 603.00 7 Step 7
93 0 on first dozen 31 Loss 603.00 7 Step 7
94 0 on first dozen 00 Loss 603.00 7 Step 7
95 0 on first dozen 17 Loss 603.00 7 Step 7
96 0 on first dozen 26 Loss 603.00 7 Step 7
97 0 on first dozen 1 Win 603.00 8 Step 7
98 10 on first dozen 7 Win 623.00 8 Step 8
99 10 on first dozen 31 Loss 613.00 9 Step 8
100 16 on first dozen 9 Win 645.00 8 Step 9
101 10 on first dozen 27 Loss 635.00 9 Step 8
102 16 on first dozen 17 Loss 619.00 10 Step 9
103 24 on first dozen 20 Loss 595.00 11 Step 10
104 36 on first dozen 3 Win 667.00 8 Step 11
105 10 on first dozen 6 Win 687.00 1 Step 8
106 4 on first dozen 8 Win 695.00 1 Step 1
107 4 on first dozen 35 Loss 691.00 2 Step 1
108 6 on first dozen 16 Loss 685.00 3 Step 2
109 9 on first dozen 34 Loss 676.00 4 Step 3
110 13 on first dozen 00 Loss 663.00 5 Step 4
111 20 on first dozen 10 Win 703.00 1 Step 5
112 4 on first dozen 11 Win 711.00 1 Step 1
113 4 on first dozen 16 Loss 707.00 2 Step 1
114 6 on first dozen 8 Win 719.00 1 Step 2
115 4 on first dozen 4 Win 727.00 1 Step 1
116 4 on first dozen 18 Loss 723.00 2 Step 1
117 6 on first dozen 32 Loss 717.00 3 Step 2
118 9 on first dozen 10 Win 735.00 1 Step 3
119 4 on first dozen 20 Loss 731.00 2 Step 1
120 6 on first dozen 2 Win 743.00 1 Step 2
121 4 on first dozen 4 Win 751.00 1 Step 1
122 4 on first dozen 20 Loss 747.00 2 Step 1
123 6 on first dozen 27 Loss 741.00 3 Step 2
124 9 on first dozen 2 Win 759.00 1 Step 3
125 4 on first dozen 34 Loss 755.00 2 Step 1
126 6 on first dozen 4 Win 767.00 1 Step 2
127 4 on first dozen 26 Loss 763.00 2 Step 1
128 6 on first dozen 8 Win 775.00 1 Step 2
129 4 on first dozen 14 Loss 771.00 2 Step 1
130 6 on first dozen 6 Win 783.00 1 Step 2
131 4 on first dozen 2 Win 791.00 1 Step 1
132 4 on first dozen 19 Loss 787.00 2 Step 1
133 6 on first dozen 6 Win 799.00 1 Step 2
134 4 on first dozen 15 Loss 795.00 2 Step 1
135 6 on first dozen 34 Loss 789.00 3 Step 2
136 9 on first dozen 8 Win 807.00 1 Step 3
137 4 on first dozen 11 Win 815.00 1 Step 1
138 4 on first dozen 30 Loss 811.00 2 Step 1
139 6 on first dozen 21 Loss 805.00 3 Step 2
140 9 on first dozen 14 Loss 796.00 4 Step 3
141 13 on first dozen 6 Win 822.00 1 Step 4
142 4 on first dozen 13 Loss 818.00 2 Step 1
143 6 on first dozen 35 Loss 812.00 3 Step 2
144 9 on first dozen 18 Loss 803.00 4 Step 3
145 13 on first dozen 14 Loss 790.00 5 Step 4
146 20 on first dozen 7 Win 830.00 1 Step 5
147 4 on first dozen 10 Win 838.00 1 Step 1
148 4 on first dozen 35 Loss 834.00 2 Step 1
149 6 on first dozen 0 Loss 828.00 3 Step 2
150 9 on first dozen 19 Loss 819.00 4 Step 3
151 13 on first dozen 4 Win 845.00 1 Step 4
152 4 on first dozen 30 Loss 841.00 2 Step 1
153 6 on first dozen 32 Loss 835.00 3 Step 2
154 9 on first dozen 18 Loss 826.00 4 Step 3
155 13 on first dozen 8 Win 852.00 1 Step 4
156 4 on first dozen 19 Loss 848.00 2 Step 1
157 6 on first dozen 20 Loss 842.00 3 Step 2
158 9 on first dozen 6 Win 860.00 1 Step 3
159 4 on first dozen 0 Loss 856.00 2 Step 1
160 6 on first dozen 22 Loss 850.00 3 Step 2
161 9 on first dozen 28 Loss 841.00 4 Step 3
162 13 on first dozen 16 Loss 828.00 5 Step 4
163 20 on first dozen 5 Win 868.00 1 Step 5
164 4 on first dozen 2 Win 876.00 1 Step 1
165 4 on first dozen 20 Loss 872.00 2 Step 1
166 6 on first dozen 24 Loss 866.00 3 Step 2
167 9 on first dozen 20 Loss 857.00 4 Step 3
168 13 on first dozen 35 Loss 844.00 5 Step 4
169 20 on first dozen 30 Loss 824.00 6 Step 5
170 30 on first dozen 35 Loss 794.00 7 Step 6
171 0 on first dozen 00 Loss 794.00 7 Step 7
172 0 on first dozen 34 Loss 794.00 7 Step 7
173 0 on first dozen 2 Win 794.00 8 Step 7
174 10 on first dozen 33 Loss 784.00 9 Step 8
175 16 on first dozen 00 Loss 768.00 10 Step 9
176 24 on first dozen 14 Loss 744.00 11 Step 10
177 36 on first dozen 21 Loss 708.00 12 Step 11
178 54 on first dozen 8 Win 816.00 8 Step 12
179 10 on first dozen 35 Loss 806.00 9 Step 8
180 16 on first dozen 24 Loss 790.00 10 Step 9
181 24 on first dozen 22 Loss 766.00 11 Step 10
182 36 on first dozen 24 Loss 730.00 12 Step 11
183 54 on first dozen 33 Loss 676.00 13 Step 12
184 81 on first dozen 33 Loss 595.00 14 Step 13
185 0 on first dozen 7 Win 595.00 15 Step 14
186 25 on first dozen 8 Win 645.00 15 Step 15
187 25 on first dozen 33 Loss 620.00 16 Step 15
188 40 on first dozen 34 Loss 580.00 17 Step 16
189 60 on first dozen 17 Loss 520.00 18 Step 17
190 90 on first dozen 32 Loss 430.00 19 Step 18
191 130 on first dozen 16 Loss 300.00 20 Step 19
192 200 on first dozen 36 Loss 100.00 21 Step 20
193 0 on first dozen 27 Loss 100.00 21 Step 21
194 0 on first dozen 21 Loss 100.00 21 Step 21
195 0 on first dozen 27 Loss 100.00 21 Step 21
196 0 on first dozen 5 Win 100.00 15 Step 21
197 25 on first dozen 29 Loss 75.00 16 Step 15

Probability Reality Check

To understand the logic behind my system, I first need to explain what I call the gambling crimes against statistics and probability math that most online “systems” commit. Take the Fibonacci sequence used for dozen bets — the classic 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55… progression. Beautiful in nature, great for sunflowers, terrible for roulette.

The Core Probability Error

A standard dozen bet covers 12 numbers on an American wheel (38 pockets). So the true win probability is:

12/38 = 31.58% win

26/38 = 68.42% loss

This probability never changes, even after 20 losses. The wheel has no memory. If you track every 21st bet after a 20‑loss streak, the win rate still converges to 31.58%. (and Brah I actually have done this)

Compounded Probability vs. Changing Odds

People confuse compounded probability with changing odds. They are not the same.

Each spin still has a 68.42% chance of losing, but the probability of losing multiple times in a row compounds:

After about seven losses, the absolute drop per step becomes small, but the next spin is still 31.58% to win. Restarting the sequence does not change the odds; it only changes your bankroll exposure. Also, after building many versions of this system, I found something counterintuitive. Stopping at step six and then resetting the sequence consistently performed about three to four percent better than continuing to step seven. Even though reaching step seven is only about a one‑in‑ten event, stacking four or five of those one‑in‑ten chances ends up being stronger than pushing the ladder all the way to step seven.

The Fibonacci Net‑Win Trap

As you climb the Fibonacci ladder, your bet size increases — but your net win target also increases, even though the odds never improve.

Using the first 9 Fibonacci bets (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34) with a 2:1 dozen payout:

But every one of those bets still wins 31.58% of the time.

Why this is mathematically stupid

Correct Comparison: Even‑Money vs. Dozen Bets

Even‑Money (red/black)

Compounded losses:

By the 5th bet, you’ve already lost more than you can realistically win back.

Dozen Bets

Compounded losses:

The Real Trade‑Off

A correct dozen‑based system would:

Bottom Line

Also I have a system that wins $100 in sequences of bets 90% of the time so, again, respectfully:

variance can Suck it.

👉 Wolfie Ladder: https://lupopedia.com/wolfie_ladder/