Roulette Wolfie Ladder version G - Last updated: October 8, 2026

86% win rate based on all 1,032 runs ( SEE results for more details )


I have made about 18 different versions of the Wolfie Ladder and have them all competing to see which is the best version. See the results page to see which is doing the best. When you go to lupopedia.com/wolfie_ladder/ the current winner is shown.

Version G is version F with stage 2 added. Stage 2 uses the same steps as version Z stage 2. The starting bank is 500 and the goal is 600. (basically 2 runs of the ladder ) Version Z is version Y, except the final stage bet amounts have changed and the number of steps changed from 7 down to 6 which i am coming to understand is the sweet spot for the win rate. also added waiting for the sequence to reset on step 28 .

There are 6 other versions of version Z that use this same system, with goals of winning $100, $200, $300, $400, $500, and $600. Winning $100 is Z2100, winning $200 is Z2200, winning $300 is Z2300, winning $400 is Z2400, winning $500 is Z2500, and winning $600 is Z2600. Counterintuitively, adding a 7th bet in stage 1 or stage 2 seemed to do worse in trials. Compounded probability increased about 3%, but the trials showed it did not work as well. When version G looses it usally feels like a crime because you have to loose 6+ times in row 2 times while playing which feels like lady luck is mad at you.

People keep misunderstanding what I actually built, so here is the truth in plain English: I am not a gambler — I am a programmer. I did not sit there playing 10,000 roulette games like some guy with a lucky rabbit foot. I wrote a program that runs the entire Wolfie Ladder — all 4 stages, all 28 steps — across 50 to 300 simultaneous games on a single page, and then I repeated that whole batch 10,000 times. That is how you get a real statistical picture. That is how you reach a ~90% win rate. Not vibes. Not superstition. Not “progressions” like Fibonacci that blow up the moment variance sneezes. The Wolfie Ladder is engineered to survive streaks, recover losses, and beat the distribution curve — and I tested it by running 10,000+ full sequences in under 30 minutes, not by hand playing one spin at a time. If people think I sat there clicking red/black like a zombie, they really do not understand who they are talking to. When i first made this system luck i guess was on my side because the first few hundred times i was playing it i was winning at a rate of 91% of the time but as i kept running it more and more times the win rate started to drop and now it is between ~83% and ~90% . And here’s the part people really don’t understand: the Wolfie Ladder wins even when the game‑level win rate is losing. For example — in one of the sequences, the system played 92 total games. Out of those:
38 wins
54 losses
Including a brutal streak where it lost every single bet from #52 through #67
That’s 16 consecutive losses in the middle of the run.
And despite that? Despite losing more games than it won? Despite eating a variance spike that would vaporize Fibonacci, Martingale, or any “pro gambler” strategy?
It still finished the sequence up +$100.
That’s the point. The Ladder doesn’t care about “win more than you lose.” It cares about sequence structure, distribution recovery, and controlled escalation. It’s engineered to survive streaks, absorb damage, and still exit the sequence profitable — even when the raw win/loss ratio looks terrible.
This is why the system works. This is why the win rate stabilizes around ~86.2%+ across 10,000 full trials. Not because it wins every spin — but because it wins the sequence. Other winning version of the wolfie ladder are version A, version B, version C, version D, and version X. version D has a win rate of 86.2% at 10,000 runs. version X has a win rate of 88.2% at 300 runs. ( it is new)



update 10/06/2026: changed first bet to be single dozen bets instead of 2 dozen bets see version H for having that be 2 dozen bets . updated the bank needed to reset to add 222 instead o f 300 at end of stage 2 as the bank needed at the end of stage 2 is a loss of 221 and the 222 is a angel number :)

THE WOLFIE LADDER SYSTEM (Step-by-Step)

CLICK HERE IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE REASONING BEHIND THESE STEPS
STAGE 1:
1️⃣ Bet $4 on the first dozen. If win → reset ladder, back to Step 1. If lose → Step 2. ( net win at this step is $8 )
2️⃣ Bet $6 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 3. ( net win at this step is $8 )
3️⃣ Bet $9 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 4. ( net win at this step is $8 )
4️⃣ Bet $13 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 5. ( net win at this step is $7 )
5️⃣ Bet $20 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 6. ( net win at this step is $8 )
6️⃣ Bet $30 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset = current bank + 80, then Step 7. ( net win at this step is $8 )
7️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. A miss stays on Step 7. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8.
STAGE 2:
8️⃣ Bet $10 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → repeat Step 8. Lose → Step 9. ( net win at this step is $20 )
9️⃣ Bet $16 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 10. ( net win at this step is $22 )
🔟 Bet $24 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 11. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣1️⃣ Bet $36 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 12. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣2️⃣ Bet $54 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 13. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣3️⃣ Bet $81 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset = 500, then Step 14. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣4️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. A miss stays on Step 14. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8.

Roulette wheel
This system was build using 80 diffent ai agents across 8 LLM models to test the best possible system for roulette using lupopedia AI platform.
The programmer captain wolfie (Eric) was too board playing just one game at a time so programmed this to play up to 500 games all at once, that way can play thousands of times a minute and find the best stratagy that holds up . .
Want the full story? Check out the Patreon post for the complete dialog between Captain Wolfie, Grok, and the mischievous Lilith!

Why my versions are A, B, C instead of major.minor.patch Because the traditional versioning system — major.minor.patch — is meaningless for what I’m doing here. I’m not shipping software releases. I’m iterating behavioral variants of a probability engine. Each version (A, B, C… all the way to ZZ if I want) represents a distinct ladder logic, a distinct recovery pattern, a distinct volatility profile, and a distinct mathematical personality. These aren’t “patches.” These aren’t “minor updates.” These are forks of logic. Version A behaves one way. Version B behaves another way. Version C might remove a step, add a step, rebalance a stage, or change the volatility curve entirely. Using semantic versioning (4.0.96, 4.0.97, etc.) would imply these are incremental changes to the same system — but they’re not. They’re parallel universes. So I use lettered versions because: They’re simple They’re human-readable They reflect behavior, not “patch level” They let me branch logic infinitely (A → B → C → … → Z → AA → AB → … → ZZ) They match how I actually think about the system In other words: Version A is a creature. Version B is a different creature. Version C is another creature. Letters make more sense for creatures than numbers.

Probability Reality Check

Steps 7 and 14 bet $0 and wait. A miss stays on that step. A hit returns to step 1 only when the bank is above bank_needed_to_reset. Otherwise the hit goes to step 8. Version Y is version H with the opening two-dozen bet of stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 converted to a single dozen bet. A dozen bet hits 12 of 38 numbers, about 31.58% of the time, and loses about 68.42% of the time. The six dozen bets before each wait fail about 10.26% of the time, so the sequence survives about 89.74% of the time. A 7th dozen bet would raise survival by about 3 percentage points, to about 92.98%. Counterintuitively, adding that 7th bet in stage 1 or stage 2 seemed to do worse in trials, so those stages stay at six bets. The house edge is still there. This is controlled exposure, not a guaranteed profit.

500-Round Simulation (American Wheel Model)

MySQL connected to collab52_salessyntax on localhost. This run was saved to wolfie_ladder_runs.

Every time this page loads it simulates 500 games using the WOLFIE Ladder exactly as defined here or stops if you win $100+ How did you do? If the run ended in the cliff, click here to try again and generate a fresh 500-game sequence. Saved runs are listed on wolfie_ladder_results.php.

Final Bank
600.00
Net Units
+100.00
Wins / Losses
70 / 135
Max Step Reached
14
Run Status
Target Hit
Table Limit Hit
No
Bank Depleted
No

Below is one 500-bet run. Each roll uses the real American wheel odds (12/38 for single dozen). Every time a win hits, we reset or loop based on rules.

# Bet Wheel Result Bank Next Step Mode
1 4 on first dozen 10 Win 508.00 1 Step 1
2 4 on first dozen 4 Win 516.00 1 Step 1
3 4 on first dozen 11 Win 524.00 1 Step 1
4 4 on first dozen 31 Loss 520.00 2 Step 1
5 6 on first dozen 3 Win 532.00 1 Step 2
6 4 on first dozen 25 Loss 528.00 2 Step 1
7 6 on first dozen 28 Loss 522.00 3 Step 2
8 9 on first dozen 32 Loss 513.00 4 Step 3
9 13 on first dozen 26 Loss 500.00 5 Step 4
10 20 on first dozen 16 Loss 480.00 6 Step 5
11 30 on first dozen 35 Loss 450.00 7 Step 6
12 0 on first dozen 0 Loss 450.00 7 Step 7
13 0 on first dozen 3 Win 450.00 8 Step 7
14 10 on first dozen 3 Win 470.00 8 Step 8
15 10 on first dozen 18 Loss 460.00 9 Step 8
16 16 on first dozen 22 Loss 444.00 10 Step 9
17 24 on first dozen 3 Win 492.00 8 Step 10
18 10 on first dozen 10 Win 512.00 8 Step 8
19 10 on first dozen 25 Loss 502.00 9 Step 8
20 16 on first dozen 23 Loss 486.00 10 Step 9
21 24 on first dozen 28 Loss 462.00 11 Step 10
22 36 on first dozen 15 Loss 426.00 12 Step 11
23 54 on first dozen 34 Loss 372.00 13 Step 12
24 81 on first dozen 00 Loss 291.00 14 Step 13
25 0 on first dozen 26 Loss 291.00 14 Step 14
26 0 on first dozen 35 Loss 291.00 14 Step 14
27 0 on first dozen 34 Loss 291.00 14 Step 14
28 0 on first dozen 26 Loss 291.00 14 Step 14
29 0 on first dozen 30 Loss 291.00 14 Step 14
30 0 on first dozen 34 Loss 291.00 14 Step 14
31 0 on first dozen 19 Loss 291.00 14 Step 14
32 0 on first dozen 4 Win 291.00 8 Step 14
33 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 281.00 9 Step 8
34 16 on first dozen 36 Loss 265.00 10 Step 9
35 24 on first dozen 8 Win 313.00 8 Step 10
36 10 on first dozen 26 Loss 303.00 9 Step 8
37 16 on first dozen 3 Win 335.00 8 Step 9
38 10 on first dozen 36 Loss 325.00 9 Step 8
39 16 on first dozen 20 Loss 309.00 10 Step 9
40 24 on first dozen 27 Loss 285.00 11 Step 10
41 36 on first dozen 5 Win 357.00 8 Step 11
42 10 on first dozen 3 Win 377.00 8 Step 8
43 10 on first dozen 0 Loss 367.00 9 Step 8
44 16 on first dozen 1 Win 399.00 8 Step 9
45 10 on first dozen 10 Win 419.00 8 Step 8
46 10 on first dozen 00 Loss 409.00 9 Step 8
47 16 on first dozen 18 Loss 393.00 10 Step 9
48 24 on first dozen 32 Loss 369.00 11 Step 10
49 36 on first dozen 32 Loss 333.00 12 Step 11
50 54 on first dozen 3 Win 441.00 8 Step 12
51 10 on first dozen 15 Loss 431.00 9 Step 8
52 16 on first dozen 17 Loss 415.00 10 Step 9
53 24 on first dozen 13 Loss 391.00 11 Step 10
54 36 on first dozen 0 Loss 355.00 12 Step 11
55 54 on first dozen 9 Win 463.00 8 Step 12
56 10 on first dozen 11 Win 483.00 8 Step 8
57 10 on first dozen 35 Loss 473.00 9 Step 8
58 16 on first dozen 26 Loss 457.00 10 Step 9
59 24 on first dozen 26 Loss 433.00 11 Step 10
60 36 on first dozen 13 Loss 397.00 12 Step 11
61 54 on first dozen 21 Loss 343.00 13 Step 12
62 81 on first dozen 17 Loss 262.00 14 Step 13
63 0 on first dozen 36 Loss 262.00 14 Step 14
64 0 on first dozen 0 Loss 262.00 14 Step 14
65 0 on first dozen 35 Loss 262.00 14 Step 14
66 0 on first dozen 31 Loss 262.00 14 Step 14
67 0 on first dozen 3 Win 262.00 8 Step 14
68 10 on first dozen 28 Loss 252.00 9 Step 8
69 16 on first dozen 27 Loss 236.00 10 Step 9
70 24 on first dozen 36 Loss 212.00 11 Step 10
71 36 on first dozen 7 Win 284.00 8 Step 11
72 10 on first dozen 16 Loss 274.00 9 Step 8
73 16 on first dozen 26 Loss 258.00 10 Step 9
74 24 on first dozen 28 Loss 234.00 11 Step 10
75 36 on first dozen 2 Win 306.00 8 Step 11
76 10 on first dozen 5 Win 326.00 8 Step 8
77 10 on first dozen 36 Loss 316.00 9 Step 8
78 16 on first dozen 1 Win 348.00 8 Step 9
79 10 on first dozen 12 Win 368.00 8 Step 8
80 10 on first dozen 8 Win 388.00 8 Step 8
81 10 on first dozen 4 Win 408.00 8 Step 8
82 10 on first dozen 17 Loss 398.00 9 Step 8
83 16 on first dozen 16 Loss 382.00 10 Step 9
84 24 on first dozen 23 Loss 358.00 11 Step 10
85 36 on first dozen 7 Win 430.00 8 Step 11
86 10 on first dozen 9 Win 450.00 8 Step 8
87 10 on first dozen 33 Loss 440.00 9 Step 8
88 16 on first dozen 4 Win 472.00 8 Step 9
89 10 on first dozen 22 Loss 462.00 9 Step 8
90 16 on first dozen 15 Loss 446.00 10 Step 9
91 24 on first dozen 17 Loss 422.00 11 Step 10
92 36 on first dozen 0 Loss 386.00 12 Step 11
93 54 on first dozen 17 Loss 332.00 13 Step 12
94 81 on first dozen 7 Win 494.00 8 Step 13
95 10 on first dozen 35 Loss 484.00 9 Step 8
96 16 on first dozen 1 Win 516.00 1 Step 9
97 4 on first dozen 13 Loss 512.00 2 Step 1
98 6 on first dozen 14 Loss 506.00 3 Step 2
99 9 on first dozen 12 Win 524.00 1 Step 3
100 4 on first dozen 31 Loss 520.00 2 Step 1
101 6 on first dozen 16 Loss 514.00 3 Step 2
102 9 on first dozen 10 Win 532.00 1 Step 3
103 4 on first dozen 15 Loss 528.00 2 Step 1
104 6 on first dozen 30 Loss 522.00 3 Step 2
105 9 on first dozen 34 Loss 513.00 4 Step 3
106 13 on first dozen 13 Loss 500.00 5 Step 4
107 20 on first dozen 24 Loss 480.00 6 Step 5
108 30 on first dozen 31 Loss 450.00 7 Step 6
109 0 on first dozen 35 Loss 450.00 7 Step 7
110 0 on first dozen 32 Loss 450.00 7 Step 7
111 0 on first dozen 32 Loss 450.00 7 Step 7
112 0 on first dozen 12 Win 450.00 8 Step 7
113 10 on first dozen 29 Loss 440.00 9 Step 8
114 16 on first dozen 11 Win 472.00 8 Step 9
115 10 on first dozen 33 Loss 462.00 9 Step 8
116 16 on first dozen 14 Loss 446.00 10 Step 9
117 24 on first dozen 22 Loss 422.00 11 Step 10
118 36 on first dozen 13 Loss 386.00 12 Step 11
119 54 on first dozen 0 Loss 332.00 13 Step 12
120 81 on first dozen 30 Loss 251.00 14 Step 13
121 0 on first dozen 2 Win 251.00 8 Step 14
122 10 on first dozen 33 Loss 241.00 9 Step 8
123 16 on first dozen 2 Win 273.00 8 Step 9
124 10 on first dozen 28 Loss 263.00 9 Step 8
125 16 on first dozen 35 Loss 247.00 10 Step 9
126 24 on first dozen 2 Win 295.00 8 Step 10
127 10 on first dozen 2 Win 315.00 8 Step 8
128 10 on first dozen 1 Win 335.00 8 Step 8
129 10 on first dozen 19 Loss 325.00 9 Step 8
130 16 on first dozen 14 Loss 309.00 10 Step 9
131 24 on first dozen 34 Loss 285.00 11 Step 10
132 36 on first dozen 13 Loss 249.00 12 Step 11
133 54 on first dozen 25 Loss 195.00 13 Step 12
134 81 on first dozen 22 Loss 114.00 14 Step 13
135 0 on first dozen 9 Win 114.00 8 Step 14
136 10 on first dozen 33 Loss 104.00 9 Step 8
137 16 on first dozen 5 Win 136.00 8 Step 9
138 10 on first dozen 31 Loss 126.00 9 Step 8
139 16 on first dozen 36 Loss 110.00 10 Step 9
140 24 on first dozen 36 Loss 86.00 11 Step 10
141 36 on first dozen 4 Win 158.00 8 Step 11
142 10 on first dozen 15 Loss 148.00 9 Step 8
143 16 on first dozen 36 Loss 132.00 10 Step 9
144 24 on first dozen 9 Win 180.00 8 Step 10
145 10 on first dozen 12 Win 200.00 8 Step 8
146 10 on first dozen 30 Loss 190.00 9 Step 8
147 16 on first dozen 22 Loss 174.00 10 Step 9
148 24 on first dozen 25 Loss 150.00 11 Step 10
149 36 on first dozen 2 Win 222.00 8 Step 11
150 10 on first dozen 16 Loss 212.00 9 Step 8
151 16 on first dozen 20 Loss 196.00 10 Step 9
152 24 on first dozen 13 Loss 172.00 11 Step 10
153 36 on first dozen 11 Win 244.00 8 Step 11
154 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 234.00 9 Step 8
155 16 on first dozen 2 Win 266.00 8 Step 9
156 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 256.00 9 Step 8
157 16 on first dozen 7 Win 288.00 8 Step 9
158 10 on first dozen 7 Win 308.00 8 Step 8
159 10 on first dozen 6 Win 328.00 8 Step 8
160 10 on first dozen 28 Loss 318.00 9 Step 8
161 16 on first dozen 00 Loss 302.00 10 Step 9
162 24 on first dozen 2 Win 350.00 8 Step 10
163 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 340.00 9 Step 8
164 16 on first dozen 29 Loss 324.00 10 Step 9
165 24 on first dozen 14 Loss 300.00 11 Step 10
166 36 on first dozen 12 Win 372.00 8 Step 11
167 10 on first dozen 29 Loss 362.00 9 Step 8
168 16 on first dozen 7 Win 394.00 8 Step 9
169 10 on first dozen 5 Win 414.00 8 Step 8
170 10 on first dozen 33 Loss 404.00 9 Step 8
171 16 on first dozen 19 Loss 388.00 10 Step 9
172 24 on first dozen 28 Loss 364.00 11 Step 10
173 36 on first dozen 15 Loss 328.00 12 Step 11
174 54 on first dozen 10 Win 436.00 8 Step 12
175 10 on first dozen 36 Loss 426.00 9 Step 8
176 16 on first dozen 19 Loss 410.00 10 Step 9
177 24 on first dozen 5 Win 458.00 8 Step 10
178 10 on first dozen 5 Win 478.00 8 Step 8
179 10 on first dozen 2 Win 498.00 8 Step 8
180 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 488.00 9 Step 8
181 16 on first dozen 31 Loss 472.00 10 Step 9
182 24 on first dozen 14 Loss 448.00 11 Step 10
183 36 on first dozen 22 Loss 412.00 12 Step 11
184 54 on first dozen 6 Win 520.00 1 Step 12
185 4 on first dozen 12 Win 528.00 1 Step 1
186 4 on first dozen 00 Loss 524.00 2 Step 1
187 6 on first dozen 11 Win 536.00 1 Step 2
188 4 on first dozen 17 Loss 532.00 2 Step 1
189 6 on first dozen 11 Win 544.00 1 Step 2
190 4 on first dozen 2 Win 552.00 1 Step 1
191 4 on first dozen 10 Win 560.00 1 Step 1
192 4 on first dozen 11 Win 568.00 1 Step 1
193 4 on first dozen 25 Loss 564.00 2 Step 1
194 6 on first dozen 18 Loss 558.00 3 Step 2
195 9 on first dozen 13 Loss 549.00 4 Step 3
196 13 on first dozen 00 Loss 536.00 5 Step 4
197 20 on first dozen 1 Win 576.00 1 Step 5
198 4 on first dozen 3 Win 584.00 1 Step 1
199 4 on first dozen 24 Loss 580.00 2 Step 1
200 6 on first dozen 11 Win 592.00 1 Step 2
201 4 on first dozen 32 Loss 588.00 2 Step 1
202 6 on first dozen 34 Loss 582.00 3 Step 2
203 9 on first dozen 36 Loss 573.00 4 Step 3
204 13 on first dozen 19 Loss 560.00 5 Step 4
205 20 on first dozen 1 Win 600.00 1 Step 5

Probability Reality Check

To understand the logic behind my system, I first need to explain what I call the gambling crimes against statistics and probability math that most online “systems” commit. Take the Fibonacci sequence used for dozen bets — the classic 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55… progression. Beautiful in nature, great for sunflowers, terrible for roulette.

The Core Probability Error

A standard dozen bet covers 12 numbers on an American wheel (38 pockets). So the true win probability is:

12/38 = 31.58% win

26/38 = 68.42% loss

This probability never changes, even after 20 losses. The wheel has no memory. If you track every 21st bet after a 20‑loss streak, the win rate still converges to 31.58%. (and Brah I actually have done this)

Compounded Probability vs. Changing Odds

People confuse compounded probability with changing odds. They are not the same.

Each spin still has a 68.42% chance of losing, but the probability of losing multiple times in a row compounds:

After about seven losses, the absolute drop per step becomes small, but the next spin is still 31.58% to win. Restarting the sequence does not change the odds; it only changes your bankroll exposure. Also, after building many versions of this system, I found something counterintuitive. Stopping at step six and then resetting the sequence consistently performed about three to four percent better than continuing to step seven. Even though reaching step seven is only about a one‑in‑ten event, stacking four or five of those one‑in‑ten chances ends up being stronger than pushing the ladder all the way to step seven.

The Fibonacci Net‑Win Trap

As you climb the Fibonacci ladder, your bet size increases — but your net win target also increases, even though the odds never improve.

Using the first 9 Fibonacci bets (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34) with a 2:1 dozen payout:

But every one of those bets still wins 31.58% of the time.

Why this is mathematically stupid

Correct Comparison: Even‑Money vs. Dozen Bets

Even‑Money (red/black)

Compounded losses:

By the 5th bet, you’ve already lost more than you can realistically win back.

Dozen Bets

Compounded losses:

The Real Trade‑Off

A correct dozen‑based system would:

Bottom Line

Also I have a system that wins $100 in sequences of bets 90% of the time so, again, respectfully:

variance can Suck it.

👉 Wolfie Ladder: https://lupopedia.com/wolfie_ladder/