Roulette Wolfie Ladder version G - Last updated: October 8, 2026

80% win rate based on all 3,615 runs ( SEE results for more details )


I have made about 18 different versions of the Wolfie Ladder and have them all competing to see which is the best version. See the results page to see which is doing the best. When you go to lupopedia.com/wolfie_ladder/ the current winner is shown.

Version G is version F with stage 2 added. Stage 2 uses the same steps as version Z stage 2. The starting bank is 500 and the goal is 600. (basically 2 runs of the ladder ) Version Z is version Y, except the final stage bet amounts have changed and the number of steps changed from 7 down to 6 which i am coming to understand is the sweet spot for the win rate. also added waiting for the sequence to reset on step 28 .

There are 6 other versions of version Z that use this same system, with goals of winning $100, $200, $300, $400, $500, and $600. Winning $100 is Z2100, winning $200 is Z2200, winning $300 is Z2300, winning $400 is Z2400, winning $500 is Z2500, and winning $600 is Z2600. Counterintuitively, adding a 7th bet in stage 1 or stage 2 seemed to do worse in trials. Compounded probability increased about 3%, but the trials showed it did not work as well. When version G looses it usally feels like a crime because you have to loose 6+ times in row 2 times while playing which feels like lady luck is mad at you.

People keep misunderstanding what I actually built, so here is the truth in plain English: I am not a gambler — I am a programmer. I did not sit there playing 10,000 roulette games like some guy with a lucky rabbit foot. I wrote a program that runs the entire Wolfie Ladder — all 4 stages, all 28 steps — across 50 to 300 simultaneous games on a single page, and then I repeated that whole batch 10,000 times. That is how you get a real statistical picture. That is how you reach a ~90% win rate. Not vibes. Not superstition. Not “progressions” like Fibonacci that blow up the moment variance sneezes. The Wolfie Ladder is engineered to survive streaks, recover losses, and beat the distribution curve — and I tested it by running 10,000+ full sequences in under 30 minutes, not by hand playing one spin at a time. If people think I sat there clicking red/black like a zombie, they really do not understand who they are talking to. When i first made this system luck i guess was on my side because the first few hundred times i was playing it i was winning at a rate of 91% of the time but as i kept running it more and more times the win rate started to drop and now it is between ~83% and ~90% . And here’s the part people really don’t understand: the Wolfie Ladder wins even when the game‑level win rate is losing. For example — in one of the sequences, the system played 92 total games. Out of those:
38 wins
54 losses
Including a brutal streak where it lost every single bet from #52 through #67
That’s 16 consecutive losses in the middle of the run.
And despite that? Despite losing more games than it won? Despite eating a variance spike that would vaporize Fibonacci, Martingale, or any “pro gambler” strategy?
It still finished the sequence up +$100.
That’s the point. The Ladder doesn’t care about “win more than you lose.” It cares about sequence structure, distribution recovery, and controlled escalation. It’s engineered to survive streaks, absorb damage, and still exit the sequence profitable — even when the raw win/loss ratio looks terrible.
This is why the system works. This is why the win rate stabilizes around ~86.2%+ across 10,000 full trials. Not because it wins every spin — but because it wins the sequence. Other winning version of the wolfie ladder are version A, version B, version C, version D, and version X. version D has a win rate of 86.2% at 10,000 runs. version X has a win rate of 88.2% at 300 runs. ( it is new)



update 10/06/2026: changed first bet to be single dozen bets instead of 2 dozen bets see version H for having that be 2 dozen bets . updated the bank needed to reset to add 222 instead o f 300 at end of stage 2 as the bank needed at the end of stage 2 is a loss of 221 and the 222 is a angel number :)

THE WOLFIE LADDER SYSTEM (Step-by-Step)

CLICK HERE IF YOU WANT TO KNOW THE REASONING BEHIND THESE STEPS
STAGE 1:
1️⃣ Bet $4 on the first dozen. If win → reset ladder, back to Step 1. If lose → Step 2. ( net win at this step is $8 )
2️⃣ Bet $6 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 3. ( net win at this step is $8 )
3️⃣ Bet $9 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 4. ( net win at this step is $8 )
4️⃣ Bet $13 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 5. ( net win at this step is $7 )
5️⃣ Bet $20 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → Step 6. ( net win at this step is $8 )
6️⃣ Bet $30 on the first dozen. Win → reset. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset = current bank + 80, then Step 7. ( net win at this step is $8 )
7️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. A miss stays on Step 7. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8.
STAGE 2:
8️⃣ Bet $10 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → repeat Step 8. Lose → Step 9. ( net win at this step is $20 )
9️⃣ Bet $16 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 10. ( net win at this step is $22 )
🔟 Bet $24 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 11. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣1️⃣ Bet $36 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 12. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣2️⃣ Bet $54 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → Step 13. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣3️⃣ Bet $81 on the first dozen. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → reset. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8. Lose → set bank_needed_to_reset = 500, then Step 14. ( net win at this step is $22 )
1️⃣4️⃣ Bet $0 on the first dozen and wait for a hit. A miss stays on Step 14. Win & bank > bank_needed_to_reset → Step 1. Win but bank ≤ bank_needed_to_reset → Step 8.

Roulette wheel
This system was build using 80 diffent ai agents across 8 LLM models to test the best possible system for roulette using lupopedia AI platform.
The programmer captain wolfie (Eric) was too board playing just one game at a time so programmed this to play up to 500 games all at once, that way can play thousands of times a minute and find the best stratagy that holds up . .
Want the full story? Check out the Patreon post for the complete dialog between Captain Wolfie, Grok, and the mischievous Lilith!

Why my versions are A, B, C instead of major.minor.patch Because the traditional versioning system — major.minor.patch — is meaningless for what I’m doing here. I’m not shipping software releases. I’m iterating behavioral variants of a probability engine. Each version (A, B, C… all the way to ZZ if I want) represents a distinct ladder logic, a distinct recovery pattern, a distinct volatility profile, and a distinct mathematical personality. These aren’t “patches.” These aren’t “minor updates.” These are forks of logic. Version A behaves one way. Version B behaves another way. Version C might remove a step, add a step, rebalance a stage, or change the volatility curve entirely. Using semantic versioning (4.0.96, 4.0.97, etc.) would imply these are incremental changes to the same system — but they’re not. They’re parallel universes. So I use lettered versions because: They’re simple They’re human-readable They reflect behavior, not “patch level” They let me branch logic infinitely (A → B → C → … → Z → AA → AB → … → ZZ) They match how I actually think about the system In other words: Version A is a creature. Version B is a different creature. Version C is another creature. Letters make more sense for creatures than numbers.

Probability Reality Check

Steps 7 and 14 bet $0 and wait. A miss stays on that step. A hit returns to step 1 only when the bank is above bank_needed_to_reset. Otherwise the hit goes to step 8. Version Y is version H with the opening two-dozen bet of stage 1, stage 2, and stage 3 converted to a single dozen bet. A dozen bet hits 12 of 38 numbers, about 31.58% of the time, and loses about 68.42% of the time. The six dozen bets before each wait fail about 10.26% of the time, so the sequence survives about 89.74% of the time. A 7th dozen bet would raise survival by about 3 percentage points, to about 92.98%. Counterintuitively, adding that 7th bet in stage 1 or stage 2 seemed to do worse in trials, so those stages stay at six bets. The house edge is still there. This is controlled exposure, not a guaranteed profit.

500-Round Simulation (American Wheel Model)

MySQL connected to collab52_salessyntax on localhost. This run was saved to wolfie_ladder_runs.

Every time this page loads it simulates 500 games using the WOLFIE Ladder exactly as defined here or stops if you win $100+ How did you do? If the run ended in the cliff, click here to try again and generate a fresh 500-game sequence. Saved runs are listed on wolfie_ladder_results.php.

Final Bank
25.00
Net Units
-475.00
Wins / Losses
54 / 136
Max Step Reached
14
Run Status
Bank Depleted or Game Over
Table Limit Hit
No
Bank Depleted
Yes

Below is one 500-bet run. Each roll uses the real American wheel odds (12/38 for single dozen). Every time a win hits, we reset or loop based on rules.

# Bet Wheel Result Bank Next Step Mode
1 4 on first dozen 31 Loss 496.00 2 Step 1
2 6 on first dozen 33 Loss 490.00 3 Step 2
3 9 on first dozen 6 Win 508.00 1 Step 3
4 4 on first dozen 36 Loss 504.00 2 Step 1
5 6 on first dozen 20 Loss 498.00 3 Step 2
6 9 on first dozen 28 Loss 489.00 4 Step 3
7 13 on first dozen 23 Loss 476.00 5 Step 4
8 20 on first dozen 14 Loss 456.00 6 Step 5
9 30 on first dozen 26 Loss 426.00 7 Step 6
10 0 on first dozen 11 Win 426.00 8 Step 7
11 10 on first dozen 21 Loss 416.00 9 Step 8
12 16 on first dozen 22 Loss 400.00 10 Step 9
13 24 on first dozen 00 Loss 376.00 11 Step 10
14 36 on first dozen 19 Loss 340.00 12 Step 11
15 54 on first dozen 10 Win 448.00 8 Step 12
16 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 438.00 9 Step 8
17 16 on first dozen 18 Loss 422.00 10 Step 9
18 24 on first dozen 9 Win 470.00 8 Step 10
19 10 on first dozen 11 Win 490.00 8 Step 8
20 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 480.00 9 Step 8
21 16 on first dozen 9 Win 512.00 1 Step 9
22 4 on first dozen 32 Loss 508.00 2 Step 1
23 6 on first dozen 27 Loss 502.00 3 Step 2
24 9 on first dozen 23 Loss 493.00 4 Step 3
25 13 on first dozen 22 Loss 480.00 5 Step 4
26 20 on first dozen 17 Loss 460.00 6 Step 5
27 30 on first dozen 31 Loss 430.00 7 Step 6
28 0 on first dozen 00 Loss 430.00 7 Step 7
29 0 on first dozen 26 Loss 430.00 7 Step 7
30 0 on first dozen 10 Win 430.00 8 Step 7
31 10 on first dozen 35 Loss 420.00 9 Step 8
32 16 on first dozen 35 Loss 404.00 10 Step 9
33 24 on first dozen 26 Loss 380.00 11 Step 10
34 36 on first dozen 23 Loss 344.00 12 Step 11
35 54 on first dozen 14 Loss 290.00 13 Step 12
36 81 on first dozen 3 Win 452.00 8 Step 13
37 10 on first dozen 5 Win 472.00 8 Step 8
38 10 on first dozen 4 Win 492.00 8 Step 8
39 10 on first dozen 26 Loss 482.00 9 Step 8
40 16 on first dozen 1 Win 514.00 1 Step 9
41 4 on first dozen 26 Loss 510.00 2 Step 1
42 6 on first dozen 0 Loss 504.00 3 Step 2
43 9 on first dozen 0 Loss 495.00 4 Step 3
44 13 on first dozen 31 Loss 482.00 5 Step 4
45 20 on first dozen 27 Loss 462.00 6 Step 5
46 30 on first dozen 10 Win 522.00 1 Step 6
47 4 on first dozen 26 Loss 518.00 2 Step 1
48 6 on first dozen 0 Loss 512.00 3 Step 2
49 9 on first dozen 22 Loss 503.00 4 Step 3
50 13 on first dozen 35 Loss 490.00 5 Step 4
51 20 on first dozen 6 Win 530.00 1 Step 5
52 4 on first dozen 32 Loss 526.00 2 Step 1
53 6 on first dozen 29 Loss 520.00 3 Step 2
54 9 on first dozen 26 Loss 511.00 4 Step 3
55 13 on first dozen 2 Win 537.00 1 Step 4
56 4 on first dozen 11 Win 545.00 1 Step 1
57 4 on first dozen 15 Loss 541.00 2 Step 1
58 6 on first dozen 14 Loss 535.00 3 Step 2
59 9 on first dozen 4 Win 553.00 1 Step 3
60 4 on first dozen 12 Win 561.00 1 Step 1
61 4 on first dozen 14 Loss 557.00 2 Step 1
62 6 on first dozen 6 Win 569.00 1 Step 2
63 4 on first dozen 2 Win 577.00 1 Step 1
64 4 on first dozen 0 Loss 573.00 2 Step 1
65 6 on first dozen 23 Loss 567.00 3 Step 2
66 9 on first dozen 18 Loss 558.00 4 Step 3
67 13 on first dozen 14 Loss 545.00 5 Step 4
68 20 on first dozen 00 Loss 525.00 6 Step 5
69 30 on first dozen 0 Loss 495.00 7 Step 6
70 0 on first dozen 5 Win 495.00 8 Step 7
71 10 on first dozen 26 Loss 485.00 9 Step 8
72 16 on first dozen 14 Loss 469.00 10 Step 9
73 24 on first dozen 21 Loss 445.00 11 Step 10
74 36 on first dozen 16 Loss 409.00 12 Step 11
75 54 on first dozen 17 Loss 355.00 13 Step 12
76 81 on first dozen 17 Loss 274.00 14 Step 13
77 0 on first dozen 3 Win 274.00 8 Step 14
78 10 on first dozen 8 Win 294.00 8 Step 8
79 10 on first dozen 1 Win 314.00 8 Step 8
80 10 on first dozen 14 Loss 304.00 9 Step 8
81 16 on first dozen 7 Win 336.00 8 Step 9
82 10 on first dozen 1 Win 356.00 8 Step 8
83 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 346.00 9 Step 8
84 16 on first dozen 35 Loss 330.00 10 Step 9
85 24 on first dozen 10 Win 378.00 8 Step 10
86 10 on first dozen 9 Win 398.00 8 Step 8
87 10 on first dozen 33 Loss 388.00 9 Step 8
88 16 on first dozen 18 Loss 372.00 10 Step 9
89 24 on first dozen 27 Loss 348.00 11 Step 10
90 36 on first dozen 8 Win 420.00 8 Step 11
91 10 on first dozen 25 Loss 410.00 9 Step 8
92 16 on first dozen 10 Win 442.00 8 Step 9
93 10 on first dozen 19 Loss 432.00 9 Step 8
94 16 on first dozen 10 Win 464.00 8 Step 9
95 10 on first dozen 00 Loss 454.00 9 Step 8
96 16 on first dozen 32 Loss 438.00 10 Step 9
97 24 on first dozen 12 Win 486.00 8 Step 10
98 10 on first dozen 13 Loss 476.00 9 Step 8
99 16 on first dozen 28 Loss 460.00 10 Step 9
100 24 on first dozen 21 Loss 436.00 11 Step 10
101 36 on first dozen 9 Win 508.00 1 Step 11
102 4 on first dozen 11 Win 516.00 1 Step 1
103 4 on first dozen 14 Loss 512.00 2 Step 1
104 6 on first dozen 24 Loss 506.00 3 Step 2
105 9 on first dozen 1 Win 524.00 1 Step 3
106 4 on first dozen 3 Win 532.00 1 Step 1
107 4 on first dozen 31 Loss 528.00 2 Step 1
108 6 on first dozen 8 Win 540.00 1 Step 2
109 4 on first dozen 15 Loss 536.00 2 Step 1
110 6 on first dozen 6 Win 548.00 1 Step 2
111 4 on first dozen 24 Loss 544.00 2 Step 1
112 6 on first dozen 14 Loss 538.00 3 Step 2
113 9 on first dozen 26 Loss 529.00 4 Step 3
114 13 on first dozen 0 Loss 516.00 5 Step 4
115 20 on first dozen 34 Loss 496.00 6 Step 5
116 30 on first dozen 36 Loss 466.00 7 Step 6
117 0 on first dozen 4 Win 466.00 8 Step 7
118 10 on first dozen 21 Loss 456.00 9 Step 8
119 16 on first dozen 29 Loss 440.00 10 Step 9
120 24 on first dozen 14 Loss 416.00 11 Step 10
121 36 on first dozen 14 Loss 380.00 12 Step 11
122 54 on first dozen 34 Loss 326.00 13 Step 12
123 81 on first dozen 22 Loss 245.00 14 Step 13
124 0 on first dozen 17 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
125 0 on first dozen 33 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
126 0 on first dozen 32 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
127 0 on first dozen 34 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
128 0 on first dozen 29 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
129 0 on first dozen 25 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
130 0 on first dozen 17 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
131 0 on first dozen 16 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
132 0 on first dozen 15 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
133 0 on first dozen 29 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
134 0 on first dozen 28 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
135 0 on first dozen 22 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
136 0 on first dozen 33 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
137 0 on first dozen 27 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
138 0 on first dozen 00 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
139 0 on first dozen 36 Loss 245.00 14 Step 14
140 0 on first dozen 2 Win 245.00 8 Step 14
141 10 on first dozen 8 Win 265.00 8 Step 8
142 10 on first dozen 30 Loss 255.00 9 Step 8
143 16 on first dozen 34 Loss 239.00 10 Step 9
144 24 on first dozen 28 Loss 215.00 11 Step 10
145 36 on first dozen 11 Win 287.00 8 Step 11
146 10 on first dozen 7 Win 307.00 8 Step 8
147 10 on first dozen 26 Loss 297.00 9 Step 8
148 16 on first dozen 32 Loss 281.00 10 Step 9
149 24 on first dozen 10 Win 329.00 8 Step 10
150 10 on first dozen 4 Win 349.00 8 Step 8
151 10 on first dozen 16 Loss 339.00 9 Step 8
152 16 on first dozen 21 Loss 323.00 10 Step 9
153 24 on first dozen 23 Loss 299.00 11 Step 10
154 36 on first dozen 33 Loss 263.00 12 Step 11
155 54 on first dozen 33 Loss 209.00 13 Step 12
156 81 on first dozen 12 Win 371.00 8 Step 13
157 10 on first dozen 3 Win 391.00 8 Step 8
158 10 on first dozen 22 Loss 381.00 9 Step 8
159 16 on first dozen 20 Loss 365.00 10 Step 9
160 24 on first dozen 14 Loss 341.00 11 Step 10
161 36 on first dozen 32 Loss 305.00 12 Step 11
162 54 on first dozen 22 Loss 251.00 13 Step 12
163 81 on first dozen 21 Loss 170.00 14 Step 13
164 0 on first dozen 1 Win 170.00 8 Step 14
165 10 on first dozen 5 Win 190.00 8 Step 8
166 10 on first dozen 23 Loss 180.00 9 Step 8
167 16 on first dozen 15 Loss 164.00 10 Step 9
168 24 on first dozen 31 Loss 140.00 11 Step 10
169 36 on first dozen 1 Win 212.00 8 Step 11
170 10 on first dozen 3 Win 232.00 8 Step 8
171 10 on first dozen 18 Loss 222.00 9 Step 8
172 16 on first dozen 16 Loss 206.00 10 Step 9
173 24 on first dozen 21 Loss 182.00 11 Step 10
174 36 on first dozen 10 Win 254.00 8 Step 11
175 10 on first dozen 32 Loss 244.00 9 Step 8
176 16 on first dozen 23 Loss 228.00 10 Step 9
177 24 on first dozen 6 Win 276.00 8 Step 10
178 10 on first dozen 28 Loss 266.00 9 Step 8
179 16 on first dozen 24 Loss 250.00 10 Step 9
180 24 on first dozen 23 Loss 226.00 11 Step 10
181 36 on first dozen 28 Loss 190.00 12 Step 11
182 54 on first dozen 34 Loss 136.00 13 Step 12
183 81 on first dozen 21 Loss 55.00 14 Step 13
184 0 on first dozen 35 Loss 55.00 14 Step 14
185 0 on first dozen 27 Loss 55.00 14 Step 14
186 0 on first dozen 2 Win 55.00 8 Step 14
187 10 on first dozen 7 Win 75.00 8 Step 8
188 10 on first dozen 17 Loss 65.00 9 Step 8
189 16 on first dozen 36 Loss 49.00 10 Step 9
190 24 on first dozen 36 Loss 25.00 11 Step 10

Probability Reality Check

To understand the logic behind my system, I first need to explain what I call the gambling crimes against statistics and probability math that most online “systems” commit. Take the Fibonacci sequence used for dozen bets — the classic 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55… progression. Beautiful in nature, great for sunflowers, terrible for roulette.

The Core Probability Error

A standard dozen bet covers 12 numbers on an American wheel (38 pockets). So the true win probability is:

12/38 = 31.58% win

26/38 = 68.42% loss

This probability never changes, even after 20 losses. The wheel has no memory. If you track every 21st bet after a 20‑loss streak, the win rate still converges to 31.58%. (and Brah I actually have done this)

Compounded Probability vs. Changing Odds

People confuse compounded probability with changing odds. They are not the same.

Each spin still has a 68.42% chance of losing, but the probability of losing multiple times in a row compounds:

After about seven losses, the absolute drop per step becomes small, but the next spin is still 31.58% to win. Restarting the sequence does not change the odds; it only changes your bankroll exposure. Also, after building many versions of this system, I found something counterintuitive. Stopping at step six and then resetting the sequence consistently performed about three to four percent better than continuing to step seven. Even though reaching step seven is only about a one‑in‑ten event, stacking four or five of those one‑in‑ten chances ends up being stronger than pushing the ladder all the way to step seven.

The Fibonacci Net‑Win Trap

As you climb the Fibonacci ladder, your bet size increases — but your net win target also increases, even though the odds never improve.

Using the first 9 Fibonacci bets (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34) with a 2:1 dozen payout:

But every one of those bets still wins 31.58% of the time.

Why this is mathematically stupid

Correct Comparison: Even‑Money vs. Dozen Bets

Even‑Money (red/black)

Compounded losses:

By the 5th bet, you’ve already lost more than you can realistically win back.

Dozen Bets

Compounded losses:

The Real Trade‑Off

A correct dozen‑based system would:

Bottom Line

Also I have a system that wins $100 in sequences of bets 90% of the time so, again, respectfully:

variance can Suck it.

👉 Wolfie Ladder: https://lupopedia.com/wolfie_ladder/